Drawing for GOLDEN RING

USPTO serial 74318420

GOLDEN RING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LOUGHRAN, BARBARA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GOLDEN RING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

STEVEN A. SWERNOFSKY

STEVEN A SWERNOFSKY D'ALESSANDRO & RITCHIEP O BOX 640640SAN JOSE, CA 95164-0640UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033distilled spirits (vodka)ABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 30, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 23, 1997EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 7, 1997ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 26, 1994EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 17, 1994CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 7, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 9, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 1, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 19, 1993EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 31, 1993CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 25, 1993UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 4, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 1, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance