Drawing for CREEPY CRAWLERS

USPTO serial 74324783

CREEPY CRAWLERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEVY, MICHAEL S
Law office
INTENT TO USE UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CREEPY CRAWLERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel Mr. Rosen

DANIEL ROSEN489 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021household or kitchen utensils and containers; namely, plastic bottles sold empty; vacuum bottles; thermal insulated containers for food or beverages; melamine bowls; plates and cups; hair brushes; hair combs; cookie cutters; lunch boxes; metal and glass cooking pans, toothbrushes and battery operated toothbrushes; toothbrush cases; meal trays, soap cases and soap dishes, wastebaskets, metal wastebaskets, plastic placematsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 7, 1996ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 13, 1996EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jan 5, 1996EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Aug 15, 1995EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 6, 1995EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Feb 16, 1995EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 3, 1995EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 19, 1994EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 8, 1994EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 22, 1994EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 22, 1993EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 6, 1993NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 13, 1993PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 12, 1993NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 4, 1993CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 27, 1993CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 8, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance