USPTO serial 74330035
BEST FRIENDS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VLCEK, TOMAS V
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BEST FRIENDS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Rodman Steele, Jr.
J RODMAN STEELE JR QUARLES & BRADYP O BOX 3188WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33402-3188UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | on-going television, radio and cable programs in the nature of game shows; production of television, radio and cable programs; videotape and motion picture film production | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 1997 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 3, 1997 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 2, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 28, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 24, 1997 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Feb 24, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 1997 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 24, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 4, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |