USPTO serial 74330169
JANIS JOPLIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARKE, NANCY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with JANIS JOPLIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard J. Shire
HOWARD J SHIRE KENYON & KENYONONE BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | entertainment services in the nature of live theatre productions and motion picture productions | ABANDONED | Jun 14, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 20, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 29, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 1997 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 27, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 21, 1997 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 27, 1997 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 18, 1996 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 8, 1996 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 14, 1996 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 17, 1996 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 21, 1995 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 28, 1995 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 14, 1995 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 17, 1995 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 30, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 7, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 6, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 7, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 7, 1994 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 2, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 24, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 1, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 11, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 7, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |