Drawing for SECOND SKIN SATIN

USPTO serial 74332680

SECOND SKIN SATIN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SUSSMAN, RONALD
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SECOND SKIN SATIN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Frank J. Colucci

FRANK J COLUCCI COLUCCI & UMANSMANHATTAN TWR101 E 52ND STNEW YORK, NY 10022

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003fragrances; namely, perfumes, perfume oils, colognes and eaux de toilette; skin care products; namely, skin creams, skin lotions, skin soaps, skin toners; cosmetics; namely, pre make-up base, liquid foundation, face powder, blush, concealer, eyeshadow, mascara, eye pencil, eyebrow pencil, lipstick, lip pencil, lipstick base; bath foams, bath oils, hair shampoos and conditioners; hair gelsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 19, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 3, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 27, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 5, 1996ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 5, 1996EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 5, 1996EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
May 4, 1995CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Oct 7, 1994CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Sep 8, 1994JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 31, 1994EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 5, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 5, 1993CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 13, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 26, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 11, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 5, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance