USPTO serial 74339032
MOTOWN MASTER SERIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ERSKINE KATHRYN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MOTOWN MASTER SERIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LOS ANGELES, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
LOS ANGELES, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | entertainment services in the nature of a musical group; band performance services; dinner theater services; exhibitions in the nature of music shows; orchestra services; production of radio, television and motion picture programs; audio and video recording studio services; video tape film production; and organizing community festivals featuring a variety of activities; namely, musical and theatrical performances | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MRAC, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by Motown Record Company, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by Motown Record Company, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by Motown Record Company, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by MRAC, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by Motown Record Company, L.P.
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named MOTOWN MASTER SERIES
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 1996 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 13, 1995 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 21, 1995 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 17, 1995 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 21, 1995 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 23, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 7, 1993 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 22, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 19, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 13, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 28, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |