Drawing for ENGINEERED ASPHALT PRODUCTS

USPTO serial 74339207

ENGINEERED ASPHALT PRODUCTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHILDRESS, J.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ENGINEERED ASPHALT PRODUCTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Albert Robin

330 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
040asphalt treatment servicesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 22, 1995EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 17, 1995ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 17, 1995EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jun 10, 1994CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Mar 11, 1994EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 20, 1993CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 12, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 16, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 8, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 25, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance