USPTO serial 74357479
CRAFTIME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAYERSCHOFF, GLENN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CRAFTIME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David A. Einhorn
DAVID A EINHORN ANDERSON KILL OLICK & OSHINSKY, PC666 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | paper cake decorations; paper ribbons; adhesives for stationery or household purposes; canvas for painting; artists brushes; drawing brushes; paint brushes; sketch pads and stencils | ABANDONED | Sep 1, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 1997 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 3, 1997 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 3, 1997 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 13, 1996 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 1996 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 7, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 6, 1994 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 8, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 1993 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 4, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 1993 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 1993 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 10, 1993 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |