USPTO serial 74378741
TERASOFT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MOORHEAD CORA ANN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TERASOFT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ann W. Speckman
ANN W SPECKMAN STOEL RIVES BOLEY JONES & GREY36TH FL ONE UNION SQ600 UNIVERSITY STSEATTLE, WA 98101-3197Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer operating programs for general purpose parallel processing computers | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 1996 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 1, 1995 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 1, 1995 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Apr 19, 1995 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 1995 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 15, 1995 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 20, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 3, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 18, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |