USPTO serial 74389130
ZYMEQUEST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELLS, KELLEY L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ZYMEQUEST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert M. Kunstadt
ROBERT M KUNSTADT PENNIE & EDMONDS1155 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | apparatus for processing human blood for use in blood transfusions | ABANDONED | Jun 26, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 23, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 23, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 1995 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 7, 1995 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 1, 1995 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 1995 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 25, 1995 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 18, 1995 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 1994 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 29, 1994 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 1, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 9, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 8, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 31, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 26, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |