USPTO serial 74402477
WIJIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2107532Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 21, 1997
- Examiner
- MANDIR, FREDERICK
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WIJIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Roseville, CA
Roseville, CA
GRANITE BAY, CA
Roseville, CA
Roseville, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott Hervey
Scott Hervey Plager Schack LLP16152 Beach Boulevard, Suite 207Huntington Beach, CA 92647UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | wheelchair parts, namely, apparatus for driving and braking wheelchairs | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 30, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Watwood, Brian
- Other trademarks owned by Watwood, Brian
- Other trademarks owned by SUPERQUAD, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by WATWOOD, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Watwood, Brian
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named WIJIT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2021 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Jun 17, 2021 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 1, 2021 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2021 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Feb 1, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 1, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2021 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 21, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2013 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2013 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 17, 2008 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 29, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 20, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 1997 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 28, 1997 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 27, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 19, 1997 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 9, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 14, 1997 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 24, 1997 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 11, 1996 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 21, 1996 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 24, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 23, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 24, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 1, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 30, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 27, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 1, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 11, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |