Drawing for FIRST GUARD

USPTO serial 74405481

FIRST GUARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMITH, LAURA E
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FIRST GUARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Maury M. Tepper, III

Maury M. Tepper, III Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, PLLCP.O. Box 831Raleigh, NC 27602UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005injectable medicine for livestock and poultry for the treatment of pneumonia and the contol of colibacillosis and salmonellosisABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 13, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 13, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 26, 1997ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 16, 1997EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 21, 1997EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Nov 23, 1996EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 22, 1996EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 22, 1996EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 22, 1996EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 11, 1995EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 25, 1995EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 5, 1995EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 18, 1995EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 25, 1994NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 2, 1994PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 1, 1994NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 25, 1994CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 15, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 12, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 5, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance