USPTO serial 74407526
FRAGRANCE FREE KALAYA OIL REFRESHING & EXHILARATING FACE AND BODY TREATMENT OIL 2 FL.OZ.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1872171Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 10, 1995
- Examiner
- MAYERSCHOFF, GLENN
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FRAGRANCE FREE KALAYA OIL REFRESHING & EXHILARATING FACE AND BODY TREATMENT OIL 2 FL.OZ.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
EVAN H. KATZ
EVAN H KATZ KANE KESSLER, PC26TH FL1350 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10019-4896Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | pure Emu oil (facial and body treatment oil) | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 15, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by New World Technology, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by New World Technology, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by New World Technology, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named FRAGRANCE FREE KALAYA OIL REFRESHING & EXHILARATING FACE AND BODY TREATMENT OIL 2 FL.OZ.
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 8, 1999 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 8, 1998 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 30, 1997 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 10, 1995 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 18, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 16, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 28, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 22, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 20, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 7, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 1994 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 1993 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 24, 1993 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 1, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 1993 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 22, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |