USPTO serial 74411300
VIPER SERIES BY FORMULA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SALEMI, DOMINICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VIPER SERIES BY FORMULA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
North Miami Beach, FL
North Miami Beach, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Claudio Morfe, Jr.
CLAUDIO MORFE JR VALDES-FAULI, COBB, BISCHOFF & KRISSSTE 3400 ONE BISCHOFF TWR2 S BISCAYNE BLVDMIAMI, FL 33131-1897Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | exercise machines | ABANDONED | Mar 29, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 1995 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 1, 1995 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 1, 1995 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 28, 1995 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 28, 1995 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 7, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 3, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 23, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 25, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |