USPTO serial 74413547
FIRSTSTEP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THAYER, GARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FIRSTSTEP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ava K. Doppelt
AVA K DOPPELT ALLEN, DYER, DOPPELTFRANJOLA & MILBRATH, PAP O BOX 3791ORLANDO, FL 32802Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | printed materials; namely, manuals, forms, scales, checklists, booklets and printed tests for evaluating young children who may have school-related problems and assessing their abilities | ABANDONED | Feb 26, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 27, 1996 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 6, 1996 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 20, 1996 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 13, 1996 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 14, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 11, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 5, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |