USPTO serial 74423923
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Herbert Dubno
HERBERT DUBNO THE FIRM OF KARL OF ROSS, PC5676 RIVERDALE AVE BOX 900RIVERDALE (BRONX), NY 10471-0900UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for adding sound to calendar appointments | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 31, 1993 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2002 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 28, 1995 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Sep 28, 1995 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 15, 1995 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 20, 1995 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 23, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 1995 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 27, 1995 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 17, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |