USPTO serial 74426645
GLOBALTRACK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2102373Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 30, 1997
- Examiner
- BUSH, KAREN K
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GLOBALTRACK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Redwood City, CA
Redwood City, CA
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
PLANTATION, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
R. GWEN PETERSON
Anthony J. Malutta Townsend and Townsend and Crew LLPTwo Embarcadero Center, 8th FloorSan Francisco, CA 94111-3834UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | satellite tracing of documents and parcels delivered by air and courier | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 30, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DHL AIRWAYS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by DHL AIRWAYS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by DHL WORLDWIDE EXPRESS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by DHL EXPRESS (USA), INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Similar marks named GLOBALTRACK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 4, 2008 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 6, 2004 | PRAN | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED | — |
| Jan 6, 2004 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Oct 27, 2003 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 1997 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 12, 1997 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 12, 1997 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 11, 1997 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 1, 1997 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 17, 1997 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 23, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 1996 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 12, 1995 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 1995 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 21, 1995 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 25, 1995 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 21, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 24, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |