USPTO serial 74427364
FULLER PRO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WOLFSON, FRANCES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FULLER PRO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Norm D. St. Landau
TUCKER, FLYER & LEWIS NORM D ST LANDAUSTE 4001615 L ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | hand tools; namely, awls, axes, bevels, bits, blades, braces, center punches, chisels, clamps, cutters, drills, drill sets, saber saw blades, reciprocating saw blades, jigsaw blades, masonry bits, wood bits, brad points and titanium bits, flaring tools, grinding wheels, hacksaws, hammers, hex keys, insert bits, levels, mallets, mitre boxes, nail sets, nut drivers, pliers, plumb bobs, protractors, pry bars, rules, saws, screwdrivers, sockets and attachments, magazine screwdrivers, squares, tack pullers, tapes, tool kits and pouches, utility knives, vises, wheels, wrenches and wood handles; power tool accessories | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 1995 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jun 7, 1995 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Dec 20, 1994 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 28, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |