Drawing for THE CRAFTSMAN ALS IK KAN

USPTO serial 74436826

THE CRAFTSMAN ALS IK KAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2028089Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 7, 1997
Examiner
TAYLOR, CRAIG
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE CRAFTSMAN ALS IK KAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kenneth F. Florek

KENNETH F. FLOREK HEDMAN & COSTIGAN, P.C.1185 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-2601UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003wood furniture polishSECTION 18 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 29, 2008C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Apr 29, 2008CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Mar 5, 2007RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Mar 5, 200789AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Feb 27, 2007PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Jan 11, 2007CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Jan 3, 200789AFREGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED—
Jan 3, 2007E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Oct 18, 2006CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Apr 7, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jul 28, 20048.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Nov 21, 20028.AFREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED—
Nov 21, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 4, 2002PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jan 7, 1997R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 12, 1996CRTPREG. CANCELLED - RESTORED TO PENDENCY—
Jan 2, 1996R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 10, 1995PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 8, 1995NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 24, 1995CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 7, 1995JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 21, 1995EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 19, 1995EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 16, 1994CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 1, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 31, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 22, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance