Drawing for STN

USPTO serial 74448122

STN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JUDGE, CONNIE M.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with STN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew J. Haliw, III

ANDREW J HALIW III HALIW, SICILIANO AND MYCHALOWYCH37000 GRAND RIVER AVE STE 340FARMINGTON HILLS, MI 48335UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009engineering software for use in manufacturing process, product development and designABANDONEDNov 1, 1989

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 15, 1997ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Dec 15, 1997OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Dec 15, 1997OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jun 13, 1995OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Mar 17, 1995ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 1995PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 27, 1995NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 16, 1994CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 29, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 24, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 22, 1994ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 13, 1994CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 12, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 5, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance