USPTO serial 74451467
OBJECTIVE COMMUNICATIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2000183Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 10, 1996
- Examiner
- PESKA, KEVIN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with OBJECTIVE COMMUNICATIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Elisabeth T. Roth
ELISABETH T ROTH SHAW, PITTMAN, POTTS & TROWBRIDGE2300 N ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20037UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | communications computer hardware containing embedded software, specifically, (i) a remotely programmable communications terminal instrument that will transmit and receive information in several media types, including standard audio, high definition audio, video of several varieties and scanned or printed documents, (ii) a computer system, comprising computer hardware and operating programs, that provides key management services for a wide spread, encrypted communications network, and (iii) a computer system, comprising computer hardware and operating programs, containing stored information such as data bases and electronic mail of all varieties which will be used to provide electronic communications services to a remotely programmable communications terminal instrument on a switched network | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 2, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Objective Communications, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Objective Communications, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Objective Communications, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named OBJECTIVE COMMUNICATIONS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2003 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 10, 1996 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 12, 1996 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 7, 1996 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 14, 1996 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 19, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 27, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 26, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 16, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 13, 1995 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 5, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 12, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |