USPTO serial 74452424
PREMIER GROUP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODSAID, IRA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PREMIER GROUP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Montreal, Quebec H2Z 1S4, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donald L. Dennison
DONALD L DENNISON612 CRYSTAL SQ 41745 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWYARLINGTON, VA 22202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | telephone communication services; electronic transmission of messages and data; and radio communication, all for high-volume telecommunications customers | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 3, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 18, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 27, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 14, 1997 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 13, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |