USPTO serial 74464056
STREET SOCCER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- QUINN, JULIE CLINTON
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STREET SOCCER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
D-91074 Herzogenaurach, DE
D-91074 Herzogenaurach, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bert A. Collison
BERT A COLLISON NIMS HOWES COLLISON HANSEN & LACKERT605 THIRD AVE STE 3500NEW YORK, NY 10158UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 1998 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 28, 1998 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 28, 1998 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 21, 1995 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 11, 1995 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 12, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 6, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 15, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 25, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |