USPTO serial 74469626
HOFMEISTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEETZOW, KAREN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HOFMEISTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Murray Schaffer
MURRAY SCHAFFER BAUER & SCHAFFER114 OLD COUNTRY RD - STE 344MINEOLA, NY 11501UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | cheese, particularly fresh cheese, cheese spread, soft cheese and cheese products particularly products made out of cheese spread | ABANDONED | Jul 30, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 1997 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 18, 1997 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 10, 1997 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jul 3, 1997 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 1, 1997 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 28, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 30, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 1994 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 10, 1994 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 10, 1994 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |