Drawing for BOSCA

USPTO serial 74472253

BOSCA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEIFMAN, ARI
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BOSCA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

H. Stanley Muir III

H STANLEY MUIR III ATTORNEY AT LAW1020 WOODMAN DRSTE 370DAYTON, OH 45432

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006metal goods; namely, leather covered or trimmed money clipsABANDONEDOct 30, 1943
014jewelry holders; namely, leather, leather covered or leather trimmed jewelry cases, of precious metalABANDONED—
016paper goods and printed matter; namely, leather covered and trimmed date books, address books, business document holders, organizers for business and personal use, checkbook cases, and pocket secretaries book covers and pen and pencil desk setsABANDONED—
020picture frames; namely, leather covered or leather trimmed leather covered or leather trimmed jewelry cases not of precious metalABANDONED—
042retail leatherware store servicesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 22, 1995PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Nov 15, 1995ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 6, 1995PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 1995CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 17, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 11, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 13, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance