USPTO serial 74472253
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
H. Stanley Muir III
H STANLEY MUIR III ATTORNEY AT LAW1020 WOODMAN DRSTE 370DAYTON, OH 45432| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | metal goods; namely, leather covered or trimmed money clips | ABANDONED | Oct 30, 1943 |
| 014 | jewelry holders; namely, leather, leather covered or leather trimmed jewelry cases, of precious metal | ABANDONED | — |
| 016 | paper goods and printed matter; namely, leather covered and trimmed date books, address books, business document holders, organizers for business and personal use, checkbook cases, and pocket secretaries book covers and pen and pencil desk sets | ABANDONED | — |
| 020 | picture frames; namely, leather covered or leather trimmed leather covered or leather trimmed jewelry cases not of precious metal | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | retail leatherware store services | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 1995 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Nov 15, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 6, 1995 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 17, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 13, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |