Drawing for THE LOCKER ROOM

USPTO serial 74475277

THE LOCKER ROOM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SANOK, DAWNMARIE DISTEFANO
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE LOCKER ROOM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alan H. Bernstein

ALAN H BERNSTEIN C/O CAESAR, RIVISE, BERNSTEIN, ET AL12TH FL SEVEN PENN CTR1635 MARKET STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2212

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042providing at home shopping services in the field of sports clothing and equipment by means of televisionABANDONEDApr 17, 1990

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 13, 1997ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 13, 1997EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 13, 1997EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Mar 15, 1996CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Nov 30, 1995CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Nov 2, 1995JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 19, 1995CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Mar 21, 1995EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 11, 1994CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 7, 1994UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
May 31, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 17, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance