USPTO serial 74490447
AIRTEXT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AIRTEXT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Walnut Creek, CA
Walnut Creek, CA
Walnut Creek, CA
AIRTOUCH COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
Other trademarks owned by AIRTOUCH COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary M. Hamaker
MARY M HAMAKER AIRTOUCH COMMUNICATIONS INCLEGAL DEPT - 21ST FLONE CALIFORNIA STSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electrical apparatus, namely telephones and pagers | ABANDONED | — |
| 038 | wireless voice and wireless data telecommunications services, namely cellular, paging, and switching and transmission services for the carriage and provision of access to various information services | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AIRTOUCH COMMUNICATIONS
- Other trademarks owned by AIRTOUCH COMMUNICATIONS
- Other trademarks owned by PacTel Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by AIRTOUCH COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named AIRTEXT
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 1998 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 21, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 29, 1997 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Mar 11, 1997 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 15, 1996 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 14, 1996 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Nov 14, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 22, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 21, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 30, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 1, 1994 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 27, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 26, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 18, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 14, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |