USPTO serial 74490943
CELL GENESYS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CELL GENESYS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Beth M. Goldman
BETH M GOLDMAN HELLER EHRMAN WHITE & MCAULIFFE525 UNIVERSITY AVEPALO ALTO, CA 94301UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | biochemicals; namely, monoclonal antibodies and fragments thereof for pharmaceutical and biological research and development | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | cell lines for pharmaceutical research and development; and cell line products for pharmaceutical research and development, namely cell line pharmaceutical proteins and preparations for the treatment of cancer, autoimmune diseases, infectious diseases, inflammatory diseases and genetic diseases | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 5, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 17, 2001 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 9, 2000 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 26, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 19, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 31, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 8, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 26, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 26, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 17, 1998 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Nov 27, 1997 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| May 27, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 4, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 31, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 24, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 4, 1996 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 4, 1996 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 6, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 13, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |