USPTO serial 74491991
VISUAL CADD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1963588Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 19, 1996
- Examiner
- CHARLON, BARNEY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VISUAL CADD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD L. BAUM
NUMERA SOFTWARE CORPORATION1501 4TH AVE STE 2800SEATTLE, WA 98110UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer programs for graphics and computer-assisted design and drafting | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Sep 1, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NUMERA SOFTWARE CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by NUMERA SOFTWARE CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by Visual CADD Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named VISUAL CADD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 2000 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Dec 14, 2000 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 14, 2000 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 4, 1999 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 19, 1996 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 4, 1996 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 22, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 1995 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 16, 1995 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 17, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 23, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 1994 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 23, 1994 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 23, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 1994 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |