Drawing for AUTOMATIC BALANCING SYSTEM

USPTO serial 74492091

AUTOMATIC BALANCING SYSTEM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICHELI, ANGELA M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AUTOMATIC BALANCING SYSTEM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jess M. Collen

JESS M COLLEN SCARBOROUGH STATIONMCGLEW AND TUTTLE, PCSCARBOROUGH, NY 10510-0827UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011electronic and electro-mechanical temperature controls for use in connection with heating, ventilating, and air-conditioning systemsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 22, 1997ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 22, 1997EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 22, 1997EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Mar 27, 1996CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jan 31, 1996CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Sep 14, 1995EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 28, 1995CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jun 6, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 22, 1995CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jan 23, 1995CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 4, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 26, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 19, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance