USPTO serial 74496494
PAELLADOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2298379Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 7, 1999
- Examiner
- BLOHM, LINDA
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PAELLADOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GARY M NATH
GARY M NATH The Nath Law Group112 S. WEST STREETALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | frozen paella (dish made with meat, seafood, vegetables and rice) | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MERITEM, S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by POSITRON INVESTMENTOS E SERVICOS LDA.
- Other trademarks owned by MERITEM, S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by POSITRON INVESTMENTOS E SERVICOS LDA.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named PAELLADOR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Dec 1, 2009 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Nov 27, 2009 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 25, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 7, 1999 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 7, 1999 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 29, 1999 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 29, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 28, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 12, 1998 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 24, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 15, 1997 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 1, 1997 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 1997 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 2, 1996 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 1996 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 30, 1996 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 23, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 29, 1995 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 6, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 14, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 10, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 3, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 6, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |