Drawing for SATONE LURES

USPTO serial 74498247

SATONE LURES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DONINGER, CHRISTOPHER G
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SATONE LURES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John S. Egbert

JOHN S EGBERT HARRISON & EGBERT1018 PRESTON, STE 100HOUSTON, TX 77002UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
040manufacture of fishing lures to order and/or specification of othersABANDONEDMay 1, 1990

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 30, 1997JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 30, 1997EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 26, 1997ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 26, 1997EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Mar 19, 1996CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jan 26, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 24, 1996JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 24, 1996JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 23, 1996EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 11, 1995ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 26, 1995CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 9, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 6, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 21, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 15, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 1, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance