Drawing for LUNCH BREAKS

USPTO serial 74509226

LUNCH BREAKS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
—
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LUNCH BREAKS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SUSAN A. RICHARDS

SUSAN A RICHARDS ESQ FISH & RICHARDSON, PCSTE 500 N601 13TH ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20005

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016printed newsletters directed to consumers of various food productsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 10, 1997ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 30, 1997JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 30, 1997EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 4, 1997EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Apr 30, 1997ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 10, 1997CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Feb 6, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 29, 1996JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 31, 1996EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 12, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 8, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 12, 1995CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 30, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 7, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 29, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance