USPTO serial 74526883
AMBROSIA BLEND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AMBROSIA BLEND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Costa Mesa, CA
Costa Mesa, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven J. Nataupsky
STEVEN J NATAUPSKY KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR LLP2040 MAIN ST 14TH FLIRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | coffee and unprocessed coffee beans | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 1996 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 18, 1996 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 18, 1996 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 16, 1996 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 18, 1996 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 26, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 24, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 15, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 23, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 1994 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |