USPTO serial 74544548
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
DK-2970 Horsholm, DK
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael B. Lasky
MICHAEL B LASKY MERCHANT & GOULD3100 NORWEST CTR90 S 7TH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-4131| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | audio visual apparatus, namely overhead projectors, monitors, tape recorders, cameras, computers, printers, printer tapes, scanners, CD-ROM drives and discs, modems, computer tape stations comprises of hardware and software; magnetic or optical data carriers, namely coded or uncoded cards, tapes, hard discs, floppy discs and compact discs; word processing software and dedicated word processing typing stations, comprises of screens, keyboards, processing units and printers; telecommunication hardware and software, for the use in office and business | ABANDONED | — |
| 035 | advertising services, namely dissemination of advertising material, updating of advertising material, rental of advertising space; sales promotion of others, namely advertising; providing office services, namely word processing and document reproduction | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 30, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 1994 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |