Drawing for MAGNAFIELD

USPTO serial 74545455

MAGNAFIELD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2167820Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 23, 1998
Examiner
POWERS, ALEXANDER L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with MAGNAFIELD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

THOMAS E. FISHER

THOMAS E. FISHER Tarolli, Sundheim, Covell & Tummino LLP1300 East Ninth StreetSuite 1700Cleveland, OH 44114

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010therapy units, namely, magnetic therapy apparatus for utilizing induced magnetic fields for physical therapy and pain reliefSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDAug 16, 1995

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 22, 2021CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Jul 16, 2009CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Nov 12, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 9, 2008UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Sep 25, 2008RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Sep 25, 200889AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Jun 18, 2008PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Jun 2, 200889AFREGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED—
Jun 2, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 3, 20048.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Jun 23, 20048.AFREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED—
Jun 23, 1998R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 23, 1998CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Apr 23, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 23, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 8, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 5, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 3, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 5, 1997CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 1, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 5, 1997CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 2, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 4, 1996CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 13, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 8, 1996SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 21, 1996IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Dec 19, 1995NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 26, 1995PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 25, 1995NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 7, 1995CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 1, 1995CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 21, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 16, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 26, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance