USPTO serial 74546007
INDIGO CAFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SUSSMAN, RONALD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INDIGO CAFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New York, NY
New York, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen B. Goldman
STEPHEN B GOLDMAN LERNER, DAVID, LITTENBERG, ET AL600 S AVE WWESTFIELD, NJ 07090UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | children's clothing and infant wear, namely sunsuits, bubbles, namely a one piece garment having gathered short legs with or without crotch snaps, creepers, crawlers, rompers, skrompers, namely skirted rompers, jumpsuits, coveralls, overalls, shortalls, shirts, tops, blouses, pants, jeans, shorts, skorts, skirts, pant sets, namely tops and pants, short sets, namely tops and shorts, skirt sets, namely tops and skirts, diaper sets, namely tops and diaper covers, skegging sets, namely tops and skirted leggings, dresses, sweaters, swimwear, exercisewear and bodywear, namely bodysuits, leotards, tights, trunks, tops, shorts, bike shorts, pants, leggings, skirts, vets and jackets and T-shirts | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 1998 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 28, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 4, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 29, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 27, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 21, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 27, 1996 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 27, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 15, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 19, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 11, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |