USPTO serial 74546352
HYGROVENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HYGROVENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
NL-2181 AB Hillegom, NL
NL-2181 AB Hillegom, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin G. Smith
KEVIN G SMITH SHOEMAKER AND MATTARE, LTDSTE 1203 CRYSTAL PLZ BLDG 12001 JEFF DAVIS HWY P O BOX 2286ARLINGTON, VA 22202-0286Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | respiratory conditioners and respiratory filters for medical use | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 1996 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 26, 1996 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 26, 1996 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 25, 1996 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 4, 1995 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 7, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 6, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 31, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 20, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 6, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |