USPTO serial 74550239
VISUAL SCHEDULING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AXILBUND, MELVIN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VISUAL SCHEDULING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Minneapolis, MN
MINNEAPOLIS, MN
MINNEAPOLIS, MN
MINNEAPOLIS, MN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frank S. Farrell
FRANK S FARRELL SCHWEGMAN LUNDBERG WOESSNER ET ALP O BOX 2938MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0938UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for accounting, finance, and manufacturing, namely inventory management and control, estimating, quoting and inventory purchasing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Borg Enterprises
- Other trademarks owned by DATAWORKS CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by DATAWORKS CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by DCD CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named VISUAL SCHEDULING
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 6, 2001 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 6, 2001 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 15, 1999 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 2, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 11, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 28, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 20, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 27, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 21, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |