USPTO serial 74551127
LITE 'N LOW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEETZOW, KAREN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LITE 'N LOW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ALLISON C. COLLARD
STEWART J BELLUS COLLARD, & ROE, PC1077 NORTHERN BLVDROSLYN, NY 11576UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | fruit, nut and non-dairy based whipped cream toppings; unflavored and unsweetened gelatin; and fruit-based snack foods | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | sauces; salad dressings; pudding; frozen confection; cookies; crackers; corn, maple, pancake, table, topping, and/or chocolate and other flavored syrups; chocolate, marshmallow and syrup toppings; flavored and sweetened gelatin; rice-based, wheat-based, and cereal-based snack foods; pizza; cakes; wheat, rice, and cereal-based snack foods, frozen entrees consisting primarily of pasta or rice | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 5, 1996 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 16, 1996 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 10, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 8, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 15, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 6, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |