USPTO serial 74579163
GOLF PRO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MATTHEWS, AMOS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GOLF PRO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Nashanic Station, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARIE V. DRISCOLL
MARIE V DRISCOLL ROBIN, BLECKER, DALEY & DRISCOLL330 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | hotel and condominium services featuring golf | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 1998 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 29, 1998 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Feb 21, 1997 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 1996 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 1996 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 22, 1996 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 15, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 10, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |