USPTO serial 74598412
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Jacksonville, FL
Jacksonville, FL
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William E. Hartsfield
WILLIAM E HARTSFIELD HAMILTON & HARTSFIELD, PC15443 KNOLL TRIAL, STE 230DALLAS, TX 75248UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | medical services, namely eye care | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 1997 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 17, 1997 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 15, 1997 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 17, 1996 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 19, 1996 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 19, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 16, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 26, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 30, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |