USPTO serial 74603544
TYPER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ATCHISON, ALAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TYPER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
103473 Moscow, RU
103473 Moscow, RU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID B. KIRSCHSTEIN
DAVID B KIRSCHSTEIN KIRSCHSTEIN, OTTINGER, ISRAEL, ET AL551 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10176UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computers; computer memory storage devices; computer interface boards; printers for computers; microprocessors; modems; computer peripherals; computer optical scanning devices and readers; electronic drawing pencils used with computers; computer software for operating video or computer monitors; computer software for use in developing new types of fonts; video recording apparatus, namely video camcorders and video magnetic tape recorders; and calculators | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | technological research, engineering, design and drafting/drawing services in the field of computer software and font development; leasing access time to a computer database in the field of computer software and font development; rental of computer software; computer consultation services in the fields of computers, font design, product design and development | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 1997 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 22, 1997 | EX1M | SOU EXTENSION 1 DENIAL LETTER MAILED | — |
| May 22, 1997 | EX1D | SOU EXTENSION 1 DENIAL LETTER PREPARED | — |
| Apr 22, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 22, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 30, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 28, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 6, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 24, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 21, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |