USPTO serial 74617225
GIVAREX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2782084Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 11, 2003
- Examiner
- POWERS, ALEXANDER L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GIVAREX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2N8, CA
Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2N8, CA
EDMONTON, ALBERTA, CA
EDMONTON, ALBERTA, CA
EDMONTON, ALBERTA, CA
EDMONTON, ALBERTA, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher J. Kulish
CHRISTOPHER J KULISH HOLLAND & HART LLPPO BOX 8749555 17TH ST STE 3200DENVER, CO 80201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | gastrointestinal cancer vaccine based on a murine monoclonal antibody and a gastrointestinal cancer pharmaceutical preparations for vaccination consisting of the monoclonal antibody supplied in a proprietary formulation for intravenous, subcutaneous, intraperitoneal or intramuscular injection in humans | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 14, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Biomira Research Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Biomira Research Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by ALTAREX MEDICAL CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by ALTAREX INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ALTAREX CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by ALTAREX CORP.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named GIVAREX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 15, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 11, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 21, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 21, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 9, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 22, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 28, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 8, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 1, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 28, 2002 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Oct 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 18, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 23, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 28, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 18, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 3, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |