USPTO serial 74617896
FRUIT-TECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 24, 1998
- Examiner
- FIRST, VIVIAN M
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with FRUIT-TECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Dr. Scholvien GmbH & Co. Essenzenfabrik
D-13512 Berlin, DE
Other trademarks owned by Dr. Scholvien GmbH & Co. Essenzenfabrik
WILD FLAVORS BERLIN GMBH & CO. KG
BERLIN, DE
Dr. Scholvien GmbH & Co. Essenzenfabrik
D-13512 Berlin, DE
Other trademarks owned by Dr. Scholvien GmbH & Co. Essenzenfabrik
EPPELHEIM, DE
Dr. Scholvien GmbH & Co. Essenzenfabrik
D-13512 Berlin, DE
Other trademarks owned by Dr. Scholvien GmbH & Co. Essenzenfabrik
EPPELHEIM, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary E. Innis
Mary E. Innis INNIS LAW GROUP LLC321 N Clark St, Suite 2465Chicago, IL 60654UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | [ food and beverage colorings made from food and plant extracts for use in manufacturing ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 003 | [ extracts from essential oils used for flavoring goods and beverages ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | fruit and plant extracts used for flavoring of goods and beverages | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Dr. Scholvien GmbH & Co. Essenzenfabrik
- Other trademarks owned by WILD FLAVORS BERLIN GMBH & CO. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Dr. Scholvien GmbH & Co. Essenzenfabrik
- Other trademarks owned by ADM WILD EUROPE GMBH & CO. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Dr. Scholvien GmbH & Co. Essenzenfabrik
- Other trademarks owned by RUDOLF WILD GMBH & CO. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named FRUIT-TECH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2019 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2019 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 27, 2019 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 26, 2019 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2019 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Jun 25, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 16, 2019 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 24, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 2, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 3, 2008 | 9G8P | REGISTERED - SEC. 9 GRANTED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 8 | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | 8PRT | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | E15R | TEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Nov 16, 2004 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 1998 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 23, 1998 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 8, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 3, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 1998 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 16, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 17, 1997 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 7, 1997 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 6, 1997 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Aug 6, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 14, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 12, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 20, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 11, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |