USPTO serial 74618147
VELAFLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COHEN, TAMI
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VELAFLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
83253 RIMSTING, DE
83253 RIMSTING, DE
Koch Konstruktive Membranen GmbH & Co. KG.
D-83253 Rimsting/Chiemsee, DE
Other trademarks owned by Koch Konstruktive Membranen GmbH & Co. KG.
Koch Konstruktive Membranen GmbH & Co. KG.
D-83253 Rimsting/Chiemsee, DE
Other trademarks owned by Koch Konstruktive Membranen GmbH & Co. KG.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JEFFREY L. VAN HOOSEAR
JEFFREY L VAN HOOSEAR KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR LLP2040 MAIN ST 14TH FLIRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | technical membranes and plastic films (other than for wrapping) made of fluorine-polymer fabric for construction purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | non-metallic transportable buildings covered by plastic films made of fluorine-polymer, in particular, halls | ACTIVE | — |
| 022 | tents and awnings | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KOCH MEMBRANE STRUCTURES GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by K. -M. KOCH GMBH & CO. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Koch Konstruktive Membranen GmbH & Co. KG.
- Other trademarks owned by Koch Konstruktive Membranen GmbH & Co. KG.
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 022
- Similar marks named VELAFLEX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 12, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 1998 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 24, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 2, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 31, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 24, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 28, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 1996 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 11, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 11, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 27, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |