USPTO serial 74618396
IMPACT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GLYNN, GERALD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IMPACT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marnie Wright Barnhorst
MARNIE WRIGHT BARNHORST THE TRADEMARK GROUP501 W BROADWAY STE 770SAN DIEGO, CA 92101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | prerecorded computer, video and audio tapes; prerecorded computer, video and audio discs; and prerecorded computer, video and audio cassettes; all featuring comic book characters and comic book stories | ABANDONED | — |
| 028 | arcade games and accessories, namely, arcade game cartridges, tapes, tape cassettes, CD-ROMs, discs; arcade game programs and arcade game machines; toy action figures comprised of plastic or metal and accessories therefor | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | entertainment in the nature of a continuing adventure show rendered live | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Top Cow Productions, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Top Cow Productions, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named IMPACT
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 1998 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 11, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 24, 1997 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 24, 1997 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 8, 1997 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 7, 1997 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 21, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 2, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 3, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 29, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |