USPTO serial 74618473
JAVELIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TINGLEY, JOHN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with JAVELIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
RACAL CORPORATION CANADA INC., THE
Mississauga, Ontario L4W 4H1, CA
Other trademarks owned by RACAL CORPORATION CANADA INC., THE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William A. Newton
WILLIAM A NEWTON THE RACAL CORPORATION M S A-217P O BOX 407044FT LAUDERDALE, FL 33340-7044UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | high frequency radio communications apparatus for voice and/or data | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 8, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 29, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 22, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 31, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |