Drawing for CHIQUITA OASIS

USPTO serial 74618619

CHIQUITA OASIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
—
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHIQUITA OASIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Louis K. Ebling

LOUIS K EBLING FROST & JACOBS2500 PNC CTR201 E FIFTH STCINCINNATI, OH 45202-4182

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042portable and stationary retail kiosks featuring food and beveragesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 22, 1997ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Sep 3, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 28, 1996CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 14, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 18, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 28, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 25, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance