USPTO serial 74618652
IWAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAMILTON, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IWAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark Harrison
MARK HARRISON SPENCER & FRANKSTE 300 E1100 NEW YORK AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3955Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | newsletters, journals, newspapers and books regarding on-line communication topics | ABANDONED | — |
| 038 | dissemination of information regarding on-line communication to others through the use of an on-line electronic communications network | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | providing on-line access through the use of a computer to magazines, newletters, journals, newspapers and books regarding on-line communication topics | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 1999 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 14, 1998 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 14, 1998 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 9, 1997 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 1996 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 18, 1996 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 18, 1996 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 4, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 6, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 1995 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 12, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 24, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 1995 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |